Friday, April 30, 2010
Putin asks to call Russia and talks for 5 minutes. When he is finished the devil informs him that the cost is a million dollars, so Putin writes him a check.
Next Queen Elizabeth calls England and talks for 30 minutes. When she is finished the devil informs her that the cost is 6 million dollars, so she writes him a check.
Finally George Bush gets his turn and talks for 4 hours. When he is finished the devil informs him that the cost is $5.00.
When Putin hears this he goes ballistic and asks the devil why Bush got to call the USA so cheaply.
The devil smiles and replies: "Since Obama took over, the country has gone to hell, so it's a local call
OK, I'm a bad man....
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Still, I'm a John McCain fan, though I'm VERY disappointed in his performance in the 08 elections AND his stand backing Amnesty for Illegals, that he recently (publicly) reversed in support of Jan Brewer. This election in November is gonna be tough.
I think it's time for John, whom I feel has done a good job all in all, to retire, but I'll put him right back in office before I'll support ANYONE wearing the tag "Democrat" (Socialist) You Democrats need to take your party back, before you present a candidate to ME.
JD is behind in the poles right now, behind even the Socialist candidate but as we know, these next couple of months can make all the difference.
Pay Attention Arizona, we might have a real conservative running for congress. Well, someone "more" conservative.
I'll be making my decision on who I'm going to support soon.
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
I don't know the truth of this posting, I didn't look for it on Snoops or any other place. The authenticity of this letter is irrelevant. Its a good letter that explains in many ways the feeling of many of us here in Arizona and in the rest of the country, we care very little for your race, we care only about the legality of your presence HERE.
I grew up in farm country, many of my friend were the kids or grand kids of illegal immigrants. You will find many of those kids on "my" side of this line today. Most of them took up the green, served this country and its people in the military, never ask for a hand out of any kind and have made their way the same way the rest of have.
The strain that illegal emigration places on the American people is easy to understand when you consider there we have between 11 and 20 million people here that should not be here. They entered this country illegally and now want to live the American Dream, without contributing a thing to it. There are people here from all over the world, NOT just Mexico, when the liberals scream "Racism" they don;t take into account the numbers of "White" illegals. I'd be willing to bet they would not say a word if a white man was arrested and deported.
Here is the letter, assumed to have been written to the editor of the Orange County Register. If you read it's contents you will see why the OCR refused to publish the opinion of an American Citizen. Pass these thoughts on to everyone you know, it might make a difference.
My wife, Rosemary, wrote a wonderful letter to the editor of the OC Register which, of course, was not printed. So, I decided to "print" it myself by sending it out on the Internet. Pass it along if you feel so inclined. Written in response to a series of letters to the editor in the Orange County Register:
So many letter writers have based their arguments on how this land is made up of immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one, suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty because the people now in question aren't being treated the same as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of entry.
Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.
They had waved good bye to their birth place to give their
children a new life and did everything in their power to
help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was
handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws
to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity.
Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out. My father fought along side men whose parents had come straight over from Germany , Italy , France and Japan. None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan. They were defending the United States of America as one people.
When we liberated France , no one in those villages were looking for the French-American or the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.
And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their
mother country. I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about. I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life. I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags.
And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty , it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking about
dismantling the United States just yet.
many thanks to my Uncle Ed for forwarding this to me.
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
There is probably a large dose of Liberal Spinelessness involved. If you are NOT for a free America, you are against a Free America and thus you are one of Obama's yapping little dogs. You can just ignore this posting and this effort by the American people to take back our country from the likes of you.
As usual, there is always someone to step in and do the job that one of the "O-Bots" should be doing. Tennessee attorney Van Irion (And candidate for the 3rd Congressional District of Tennessee) has filed a class action suite against the President, the Speaker and the Majority leader of the Senate for the benefit of the people of Tennessee. The Suite also names the United States of America as a defendant.
ObamaCare Class Action, the Voice of "We the People"
As of this writing (and in less that a few days) the suite has more than 1400 signers (gaining more than 200 from the time I signed on last night at midnight) from all over the nation. All 50 states are represented.
Take the time to Join up and tell Obama and his minions that we will not go down the road to failed socialism with them.
I stole the FAQ page from Van's site and include it here:
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. Can anyone join the class action against Obamacare?
A. Any US citizen or company can join as a plaintiff to the action by filling out the form HERE.
Q. Will it cost me anything to join the class action against Obamacare?
A. No, Attorney Van Irion is litigating the case pro bono and is covering the court costs personally.
Q. What happens next in the case?
A. The complaint will be amended to add all of the co-plaintiffs that have volunteered to join. The amended complaint will then be served on the defendants and they will be required to answer. They may do so by filing a counter motion or by filing an "Answer" to the claims in the complaint.
Q. What specifically is the case challenging?
A. Three claims are made in the complaint:
- Abuse of Authority - The actions of the Defendants are not within the scope of authority granted them by the U.S. Constitution.
- Violation of 10th Amendment - The actions of the Defendants violate the explicit limitations in the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
- Breach of Oath of Office - The actions of the Defendants represent a breach of the Defendants’ duties contained within their oaths of office to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution.
Q. Are there other attorneys on the case?
A. Several constitutional attorneys have offered their assistance pro bono for this case. We have a well skilled team to make this challenge.
Q. How is this case different from the other lawsuits filed against Obamacare?
A. This case has unique causes of action, as outlined above, that directly challenge the erroneous "Commerce Clause" and "General Welfare Clause" precedents of the Supreme Court. The interpretation of past courts have essentially rendered moot any limitations on the Federal government established in the Constitution.
The Commerce clause argument and the 10th Amendment argument were intended to be complimentary, just like those two parts of the Constitution are complimentary. They are opposite sides of the same coin. The argument is also about Canons of Legal Interpretation: Any interpretation of a single clause that negates the overall purpose of a law, contract, or other document, must be wrong. Such a clause can be included to create exceptions to an overall rule, but in those cases, the clause must be very clear about its limitations in reference to the overall purpose of the document. The scope of such exceptions must be clear and the courts must interpret them as narrowly as possible. The actions of Congress over the past 70 years have become the illustration that the "Commerce Clause" and the "General Welfare Clause" were misinterpreted as many years ago.
Go ahead.. you know you want to...
Webmaster's Fellow Bloggers, Please Help this go Viral,
From The Gateway Pundit's Site:
GOP Official & Boyfriend Savagely Beaten For Wearing Palin Pins – Including Broken Leg, Jaw, Concussion… Media Silent
And they call "US" the violent ones.
Conservatives, Arm yourselves.
As is stated in the comments of this story, we are now in a low grade civil war. No one should take a beating like this because of their politics, but the liberals made the call. Now they are attacking women in public.
Hand it back to them.
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Much younger than I, far, far less experienced, not only in the "world" but in our still great, (but threatened) nation, he still feels that he has a valid social opinion. To make things worse, he's not just a liberal, but is a socialist. (or at least fashionably claims to be)
Understand, this is a debate based on a status update that said:
"since the world seems to be losing its mind and trying to walk even further to the right everyone post your favorite quotes from 80's leadership!"
I spent the next 45 minutes or so gleefully posting Reagan quotes... ;-) the good ones. I ended with the best one I know of concerning libtards:
Its not that our Liberal Friends are wrong, its that they KNOW so much, that isn't TRUE.
I can't even guess at the number of replies between he and I that ensued, when I made a point, he skipped over it and went to some other banality, indirectly blaming Bush, the Tea Party, blah blah... ( I will allow that he never used the obscenity "Tea Bagger", to his credit.)
This is the last entry I made. it bounces but you can kind of follow the rest of the "debate" from it.
its pretty amusing how you skip over the meat of the issue and fall on the bullshit I write.
Like the bit about world history and socialism. "SKIPPED"
The part about Lieberman and my friend John... Neither of them are Conservatives, "SKIPPED".
BTW, I, Like most conservatives I know, didn't vote "for" McCain, we voted against Obamawa. Because he lacked the credentials to be the president. One look at his track record of failure as a senator was all I needed.
It becomes clear to many of his supporters, every day.
40% of the "Tea Party" are registered Democrats or independents. (No, I'm not a member of a Tea Party Organization)
The bit from the Reagan quote about Communism. "SKIPPED"
Do you actually know the differences between Marxism, Socialism and Communism?
I ignored the part about immigration, mostly because it gives you the chance to use the conditioned response of "Racism" or "Bigot". (You should thank your Master "O" for giving you that out to almost any argument btw. Most of the time its all a liberal has.)
I grew up with the children of illegals. They are and were, some of my best friends. I'm positive you could never grasp my take on immigration. I've never met a liberal yet that can. But I'll not support amnesty for invaders.
George Washington was building a Nation, Immigration, legitimate immigration, was a key element to that building. You liberals are only trying to build a power base using the broken people of shitty little 3rd world hell holes.
Note the term "using the people". How enlightened of you as a group.
you skipped over the part about abortion the instant you learned I had an unexpected opinion on it. But I'll define it for you, Roe vs Wade has to GO, and not because I hold some bullshit moral or religious revulsion for it.
But because it's just plain bad legislation and under the 10th amendment, it's illegal legislation. It's up to the states, PERIOD.
There is a complete copy of the constitution on my person at all times. It reads the same today as it did so long ago. Its written in plain English so that ALL can understand it. It is not a changing or living document, this nation, that has worked so well for so long, through our system of checks and balances, along with constitutional simplicity, only works because it works.
Skipping major points of a debate is hardly a sanctioned method of winning that debate, it worked for Hussein #youfailed Obama only because the press allowed it to. That might have been OK with you, But not with me.
This is a nation of choices, if you choose to support or finance the dregs of our society, the undeserving and useless, then by all mean, I support your right to do so. I'll even help you find away to give them all your money.
I demand that you support my right to totally ignore them. I will continue to support those that contribute to our society, not leach from it.
This debate ends here.
Saturday, April 3, 2010
There are those that would accuse me of this and I suppose I "should" admit to it but I just can't bring myself to do it.
I do spend quite a bit of time spreading information designed to incite, arouse or just plain piss people off with the current sorry state of our government, our country and those people that have come to power.
(Note: I sometimes, inadvertently, post or refer to a piece of data that turns out to be "wrong" or even a blatant lie. For this I humbly apologize. It is NEVER my intention to spread a lie, I have found there to be just way to many truths about the Obama thuggery to ever need a lie. I just didn't get far enough in my research or trusted a source a little more than I should have.)
I want people angry but mostly I want them alert. Hatred is a wasted emotion, violent action needs to be saved for self defense and a last effort. Prejudice is unacceptable in any form, except when it is used by the left, against the right. I more than welcome this and we on the right take a battering from it. (may I have another please?)
I welcome it because it causes damage to the left, every time they play the "Race Card" and its fairly funny.
I like to point that out... just a little bit of rabble rousing (got to stay in practice) ;-)
If you step back and take a good look at what is going on RIGHT NOW, the left has turned into a collection of shrieking, paranoid little girls. Any statement made opposing the health care take over and the assault on American Liberties sends these drones into a frenzy of howling about "racism".
Why is it always "racism"? Because its the only thing their "Dear Leader" gave them. he was very careful in the beginning to make it very clear that anything said against him should be decreed "racism".
I know way to many people that submitted because they greatly fear being called a racist.
Now when I speak, when I point something out that is likely to incite harsh feeling, arouse people to anger, I'm called a racist.
I found that to "become" a racist, all I had to do was exercise my rights to free speech and free choice and vote for the white guy... That's it. I weighed the choices, found Hussein Obama wanting in many many areas and chose the old white guy. I'm now a racist...
AND, a "rabble rouser".
I found another term that seems to mean, in our troubled times, almost EXACTLY the same thing. A term that describes a person that uses emotion, hate, prejudices, etc to arouse strong feelings and what may become (has become lately) violent actions.
Think about it.
Sure Phil, ya sniveling bastard. I saw the video, I heard your words, I saw your reactions to the interviewer, Adam Sharp of the St. Louis Tea Party.
I saw and heard your treachery.
I saw you tuck tail and run like the coward you and your kind are.
You were completely out maneuvered, Sharp got you to admit your position on Health Care and now you want us to believe that what anyone can see is a strait forward statement, (probably one of the few times you've ever been honest in your life) is OUT OF CONTEXT? How the hell can it be out of CONTEXT? We heard what you said and how you said it.
You are once again depending on the stupidity of your constituents to carry you through your own big mouth mistakes.
NOT THIS TIME.
With no interest in being "fair" at all, I'm still going to post Phil Hare's YouTube reply to the tea party video. (I bet this one don't go viral the way your first show on the subject did Phil.)
Groveling for Dollars:
The Fox New Article I got this from is here: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/03/congressman-defends-constitution-comments-health-care/
When you're done watching this drivel, watch the one I've got posted below it... Remember These videos are untouched. Remember he helped sell your freedoms and liberties down the river.
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Rep. Phil Hare from IL:"I don't care about the Constitution."
The sheriff and his men entered the smoking mess but did not find the remains of anyone, including the President. They spotted a lone farmer ploughing a field not too far away as if nothing at all happened. They hurried over to the man's tractor.
"Hank," the sheriff yelled, panting and out of breath. "Did you see this terrible accident happen?" "Yup. Sure did." The farmer mumbled unconcernedly, cutting off his motor.
"Do you realize that is the airplane of the President of the United States?" "Yup.""Were there any survivors?" "Nope. They's all kilt straight out" the farmer answered. "I done buried them all myself. Took me most of the morning."
"President Obama is dead?" the sheriff shouted. "Well," the farmer grumbled, restarting his tractor. "He kept a-saying he wasn't... but you know what a liar he is!"t